Built a token that only mints when a real solar system actually produces the electricity backing it — thoughts?

What it is: Outflow tokens are minted 1:1 against real, physically-verified solar electricity production — 1 token per whole megawatt-hour, and only after that megawatt-hour has actually been generated by a real residential solar system and confirmed through an oracle pulling live data straight from the system's own monitoring API. No presale, no fixed supply set in advance — the supply is capped by however much real electricity has actually been verified, nothing more.

How it works technically: Each new verified megawatt-hour mints one NFT, and that NFT has its own token bound account (ERC-6551) holding exactly one Outflow token. So ownership isn't just a balance in a contract — each token lives inside its own on-chain wallet tied to a specific, individually verified unit of real-world production, minted in the exact chronological order it happened.

What it's explicitly not: Not a REC, not a carbon credit, not a security, no yield, nothing redeemable. It doesn't claim to represent electricity itself or any commodity — it's a verified historical record that a specific amount of solar power was actually produced, at a specific place, at a specific time.

Current traction: One real system live — a 33-panel residential install in Minnesota, active since July 2023, ~32 MWh verified so far. Contracts are built and audited, oracle pipeline is live and pulling real data. First NFT batch is about to mint.

What I want feedback on: Whether tying token issuance directly to oracle-verified real-world production (instead of a fixed supply or emissions schedule) makes sense to people here as a model, and whether the "no yield, no redemption, purely historical record" framing is clear enough or if it reads as confusing/pointless to a typical crypto audience.