I feel like there are some hard fast rules here, Matlock style lawyer rules for the court in beating these people in court. It is of course beyond shameful that I cannot even name the plaintiff and defense or cases for the major privacy related cases acting as imminent threats to this industry, I can only say, if you are on the side of the government in these cases, you are an enemy to this industry.

That being said, there is mass misinformation about how brokers and frontends and UI UX and TDL/Icann/HNS/ENS and aml policy work, each of these issues is its own expert area, and most people do not understand it.

I have an extensive background with regular tradfi commodity derivatives, so I will be suffering no fools. There is absolutely no way some one can

Write the instructions in Haskell to interact with a smart contract in sand on the beach, and reproduce it in live production successfully anywhere in the world on any machine connected to the internet

because this is *Not* how Tradfi works, this is not how facilitation, association, advertising, marketing, business operator, custodianship, principle agent relations, aws servers, api keys, intermediation layers, order relayers, brokers, etc, it is not possible for the UI UX on stocks, bonds, derivatives, commodities, interest rates, forex, or centralized crypto exchanges,

It is only possible to reproduce interaction with a smart contract based on raw programming language written in the sand on a beach, with true smart contracts in DeFi, this is fundamentally axiomatically not possible with Tradfi. This has radical legal implications at the highest levels of court, globally.

Did God Host the Smart Contract in The Sand. are you Fully Schizo and Cracked Mr Prosecutor?