Earlier today it was reported that MicroStrategy now owns 140,000 Bitcoin, but is this a good thing or a bad thing? A lot of the crypto community embrace Michael Saylor’s support of Bitcoin, but how is this not centralisation? We all see how incredibly well this investment will pay off for MicroStrategy, but it’s already enough to cause significant market volatility, and I don’t see MicroStrategy ceasing further accumulation, which will only give them a greater ability to control the market.
So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?
[link] [comments]
You can get bonuses upto $100 FREE BONUS when you:
💰 Install these recommended apps:
💲 SocialGood - 100% Crypto Back on Everyday Shopping
💲 xPortal - The DeFi For The Next Billion
💲 CryptoTab Browser - Lightweight, fast, and ready to mine!
💰 Register on these recommended exchanges:
🟡 Binance🟡 Bitfinex🟡 Bitmart🟡 Bittrex🟡 Bitget
🟡 CoinEx🟡 Crypto.com🟡 Gate.io🟡 Huobi🟡 Kucoin.
Comments